
Architectural design now more than ever is a shared production with the Chief Architect perhaps if he or she is lucky leading the team, but we all want to believe in the Starchitect as Renaissance genius, while the truth is perhaps more mundane the effect of brand building and name dropping by developers and journalists. David Galbraith has an interesting take on this phenomenon. While many Architects working today actively pursue a strong style or self branding programme only a few admit to the fact, check out FAT architectures ironic (but how much, take a look at their work?) page on how to become a famous architect. Branding architecture for its own sake seems an inherently dangerous thing to do as Architecture and Fashion don’t work to the same time lines or cultural fault lines. I would say the strongest brands in Architecture are those names from the past whose portfolio is still traded on today, usually their furniture and product design, their architectural work is subsumed bythe brand styling of a piece of glassware or chair. Aalto is the perfect example of a world famous architect having been turned into a tradeable brand just think of the savoy vase.
-
Recent Comments
- lewism on Waterfront Hotel Approved
- emmdee on Waterfront Hotel Approved
- Waterfront Hotel Approved - lewism on Waterfront Hotel
- Waterfront Hotel - lewism on South Harbour
- Francisco Ortiz on Lost America
- Francisco Ortiz on Open Source Food
-
Otherwise at
One Trackback
Architecture Branding and Copyright
Reading a post on lewism about Branding Architecture has made me think about where this phenomenon might take us. Given that the premise of brand name architects does appear to be true for a select few at the top of the profession and that they have al…