I love Amsterdam. I lived there for two years, and fell in love there. The city is a fantastic backdrop to life which contains wonders for anyone and everyone, from the cross eyed French teenagers stumbling out of their coffee shops we sometimes bumped into outside our front door to rich retired couples shopping for culture. Quite apart from being a perfect base for checking out some great Architecture, Amsterdam had many urban strengths when we were there, it had an amazing social and cultural mix, and behind its faux liberalism also a hidden conservatism. Its public housing rules and the Dutch ‘gaming’ of those rules and renting arrangements meant that very low income families do live right beside expat types on massively different salaries. But is some of that social richness being eaten away in the name of ‘progress’? The city has recently rebranded as ‘I amsterdam‘ and is gentrifying at a fast pace but it may have a negative effect on the city in the long term. See These excellent articles online extreme makeover and photos of the wild frontier of Amsterdam from mute magazine.
-
Recent Comments
- lewism on Waterfront Hotel Approved
- emmdee on Waterfront Hotel Approved
- Waterfront Hotel Approved - lewism on Waterfront Hotel
- Waterfront Hotel - lewism on South Harbour
- Francisco Ortiz on Lost America
- Francisco Ortiz on Open Source Food
-
Otherwise at
One Comment
A great follow up article in mute also about Amsterdam;
According to the French urbanist Lefebvre ‘the right of the city signifies the right of citizens and city dwellers, (…), to appear on all the networks and circuits of communication, information and exchange.’ We need to re-imagine what a real Creative City would look like. Let the first condition be that it’s software runs on programming that is ‘open source’.
Back to the Future of the Creative City: Amsterdam’s creative redevelopment and the art of deception