Some Brutal Friends of Mine

There has been alot of news recently about some Brutalist Masterpieces in the UK, and they always seem to touch a raw nerve with everybody. So it seemed useful to make a post covering three of these buildings because of their contrasting fates.

Trinity Car Park in Gateshead by Owen Luder

trinitycarpark

Photograph: Mick Donnelly

As Kosmograd sums up in his post this is a mid 60′s Car Park made famous by its appearance in the film Get Carter. A building I have some personal knowledge of having studied Architecture at Newcastle. When I visited it, it seemed in my student days to evoke a kind of urban cool of revolt against all things kitsch and twee and ‘little england’. However its looming presence over the skyline of Gateshead must be acknowledged as an urban sore. The 60′s planning promise in Tyne and Wear was for a pure modernist future of pedestrian walkways crisscrossing over a modern road infrastructure, a perfect driveable and walkable city.The city and planners went ahead with their scheme straight out of the le corb cook book for city building, (great architect as he was did he ever really understand urbanism?). The price of this dream was the destruction of much of the medieval and walkable city. In its place the road footprint of the modernist dream was built but not the pedestrian one. The actual inhabitants of these cities had been sold a dud.

Now in its place will be some sort of development by Tesco, including ironically a car park. None of the real issues of the urban fabric will be addressed, we will just get a kitsch little england development, a flawed but honest work taken down for the sake of a junk box with no other motivation than profit. Bah!

St. Peters Seminary by Gillespie Kidd and Coia

St.PetersSeminary

st.peters seminary

Photograph: zolita1908 & Photograph: Riba

The next Brutalist masterpiece up for the chop may be St. Peter’s Seminary near Glasgow, except that although this building was always obsolete from before the moment of its completion, its the Scottish modernist masterpiece we never had so to speak. But even as it rots there are strong moves to preserve it in some way. I hope it can be saved. Read the excellent Guardian article about it.

Toppila Pulp Mill by Alvar Aalto. (Built in 1930-33, extended in 1942-44. Mill was closed in 1985.)

Paper Mill

Photograph: Jukkar

This fantastic Industrial building by Aalto, perhaps not a brutalist building per say but definitely carrying that same muscular power, unfortunately suffers from a third fate. No longer a working paper mill any redevelopment has been stifled by the authorities, the holy work of Aalto requiring being unadulterated for all time, so it just sits quietly slipping back into the earth slowly! See the notes on the picture in flickr by jukkar.

All these buildings could be saved and even should be reused and reinvigorated, but don’t hold your breath that any one of them will make it!

To see these buildings mapped check out my brutalism tag in tagzania.

Filed under: Architecture

Tags: ,

Comments

  1. Jukka says:

    Good thoughts on brutalism… Pure brutalism, as in concrete cast at location, has never been too big in Finland, mostly because the problems with insulation and such. Precast concrete has been a huge hit in finland, though… :)

    I never really liked Oulu, but I did love the library and the theater there. The original plan included an office tower to the seaside of the island and city planners suggested demolishing several old buildings (including the architecture department) and replacing them with typical 60′s apartment buildings. I’m not totally convinced that this would’ve been a good thing.

  2. Lashie says:

    ..how close do you think Brutalist and Futurist ideas fit together? I mean when you take a look at what was penned in futurist manifesto’s..its pretty spectacular stuff eg. http://www.rebel.net/~futurist/arch_c1.htm but it looks quite similar to the above.

    ..what would be great is if these objects could just be left, in place like massive urban sculptures to be photographed by generations of art historians, since that’s the way they best appear…with dramatic lines of perspective, heavy shadows and a sense of weightlessness like some celestial city..

    ..in reality, on the ground, they often don’t work. Like Barbican (not Brutalist I know but still very heavy) in London..a wonderful concrete dream that just never seems to catch the imagination of the tax-paying public from one generation to the next but which millions would pay to see if it formed the back-drop to say Fifth Element or some Blade Runner sequel..

    ..Brutalism forgot the kitsch heart of man and our craving for shiny, decorated things. Brutalism delivered muscle when we really wanted a sequined dress. A little too much honesty and maybe too close to the bone.

  3. Jukka says:

    I added some examples of brutalism in Finland to my Flickr photos, if you’re interested.

  4. lewism says:

    @Jukka,
    Just had a look at them its all by Ruusuvuori right? I just saw his Weegee building for the first time last week and I really liked it.

    @Lashie,
    I think you have the required mindset for Brutalism. Maybe Futurism and Brutalism share a romantic mindset, in that they are in love with a certain set of ideas about Architecture to the exclusion of all else. There is something both wonderfully intoxicating about them both, although sometimes distasteful.
    The Barbican I remember from walking around just seems badly planned at an elemental level. You walk past service entrances to get in etc…. There is some great architecture and crappy planning, its a deeply flawed jewel.

  5. Jukka says:

    The Huutoniemi-church is by Ruusuvuori, the chapel in Turku is by Pekka Pitkänen. I just added tags accordingly.

  1. [...] it. Go here to sign the online petition but you only have until march 7th to sign. I posted last summer about another brutalist masterpiece that is now demolished, they may be mostly unloved, but they [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Preview:

# Anonymous says:

Posted on May 17th, 2012, 13:20